I am including a copy of a recent InformationWeek article in my blog this time. The article talks about errors in programming that can lead to security breaches in applications. Apparently a government-sponsored software assurance initiative has been formed. This is positive news in our fight for cyber security. I personally believe that the threat of a coordinated cyber attack is as likely as another 9-11 type physical attack. A large scale cyber attack could cause serious disruption of business and worsen this already stagnant economy. I urge all IT organizations to look into their development practices and at their applications to assure that they are secure. The IW article points out common areas that are vulnerable. This must be a priority for IT executives today.
Although it may not be politically correct in some circles to openly declare that our civilization is under attack, I will say that it is. There are organized and often state-sponsored enemies of western civilization that have made it their mission to disrupt or destroy our way of life. The battlefront is varied and it is dynamic. Cyber security should be of concern to all of us. Think of it as a vulnerable and exposed “supply line” that is analogous to the supply lines that stretched far behind battlefields of old. Those supply lines could be attacked and cut off, therefore limiting a force’s ability to function. The analogy holds true for cyber lines today. We are exposed.
It is not just about firewalls and filters, but it is about HOW code is written and HOW it is deployed. Errors can be dangerous. Not just frustrating, but downright dangerous. You should remove as many errors from your processes as possible. My advice to IT managers is to spend time and resources eliminating errors. Not only will it save your company money, but it could be an active defense for ALL of us.
InformationWeek Article:
By Thomas Claburn
Jan. 12, 2009
URL:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212701491
25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors Exposed
By publicizing these common programming errors, the participating organizations hope to make software code, and by extension the nation's cyberinfrastructure, more secure.
Experts from more than 30 U.S. and international cybersecurity organizations plan to disclose the 25 most dangerous programming errors on Monday, at a media event in Washington, D.C.
The
CWE/SANS Top 25 List was compiled with help from organizations and individuals including Apple, CERT, Microsoft, Oracle, Red Hat, and Symantec, to name a few. It is managed by The SANS Institute and Mitre, and funded by U.S. Department of Homeland Security's National Cyber Security Division and the U.S. National Security Agency, both of which also contributed to the development of the list.
CWE stands for Common Weakness Enumeration, a government-sponsored software assurance initiative.
By publicizing these common programming errors, the participating organizations hope to make software code, and by extension the nation's cyberinfrastructure, more secure. Just two of these errors led to more than 1.5 million security breaches in 2008, according to the groups.
"This activity is an important first step in managing the
vulnerability of our networks and technology," said Tony Sager, director of the Vulnerability Analysis Office at the National Security Agency, in a statement. "We need to move away from reacting to thousands of individual vulnerabilities, and focus instead on a relatively small number of software flaws that allow vulnerabilities to occur, each with a general root cause. This allows us to then target improvements in software development practices, tools, and requirements to manage these problems earlier in the life cycle, where we can solve them at large scale and cost-effectively."
The hope is that the errors list will serve four major purposes: To make software more secure for buyers by requiring that vendors certify their software is free of these top 25 errors; to incorporate awareness of these errors into software testing tools; to provide information necessary for educators to teach more secure programming techniques; and to provide a guide for employers to determine the abilities of programmers to write code free of these errors.
"The first two errors on the Top 25 are improper
input validation and improper
output encoding, and they earned the top rating for good reason," said project editor Steven Christey of Mitre in a statement.
"In 2008, hundreds of thousands of innocent, and generally trusted, Web pages were modified to serve
malware by automated programs that burrowed into
databases using
SQL injection," he said. "The attack worked because countless programmers made the exact same mistake in their software. In a 2005 incident exploiting these same two errors, a teenager used a cross-site scripting attack to create a worm that hit the profiles of over 1 million
MySpace users in less than a day, causing a temporary outage for the entire site."
The Top 25 List consists of three categories of programming errors: Insecure Interaction Between Components (nine errors), Risky Resource Management (nine errors), and Porous Defenses (seven errors). Examples of errors in the respective categories include: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation; CWE-119: Failure to Constrain Operations within the Bounds of a
Memory Buffer; and CWE-285: Improper Access Control.
For the complete list and explanatory information, visit
sans.org/top25 or
cwe.mitre.org/top25.
In Untagged
Comment (0)
Read More...
